is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Farmers told Galway-Dublin greenway won’t be forced through, but minister says CPO option “essential”

Keeping the option of using compulsory purchase orders for walking and cycling routes is “essential” to allow the Government to protect significant funding spent on greenway projects, the minister of transport Paschal Donohoe has said.

Minister Donohoe was responding to a written parliamentary question by Finian McGrath TD, who is outspoken for his focus on the misbehavior of some people who cycle.

Separately, local media in Galway reported yesterday on a meeting between farming groups and the minister. Galway Bay FM reported that: “IFA County Chairman Pat Murphy says that Minister Donoghue listened to farmers concerns at last nights meeting – and gave assurances that the project would not be forced through.”

Groups of farmers in Galway and elsewhere have been set against the use of Compulsory Purchase Orders (CPOs) for cycling projects, deeming them less important than other infrastructure such as roads, motorways and power lines.

To-date many greenways in Ireland have been developed using ‘permissive access’ arrangements where landowner agree to the development of greenways across their land. This has allowed some county councils to develop greenways fast and relatively cheaply, but it has also resulted major access and design compromises such as long, awkward or less accessible temporary and permanent detours — sometimes onto busy roads with no safe paths.

In the parliamentary reply dated last Thursday, Minister Donohoe, who is a Fine Gael TD for Dublin Central, said: “While the Deputy does not specify any particular greenway development I would like to take the proposed Dublin to Galway Greenway for which CPO may be required as an example. I understand that in the planning for this Greenway both the National Roads Authority and Westmeath County Council received similar legal advice that the appropriate legislation to compulsory purchase land required for the purpose of the delivering the greenway is section 213 of the Planning and Development Act, 2000.”

He said that this section of the planning acts makes “no reference to cycleways or greenways but does to the Local Authority having the power ‘for the purposes of performing any of its functions’.”

The minister added: “The Deputy will appreciate that it is essential for Government to have the ability to protect the potentially significant expenditure that can be incurred for the provision of greenways along with the protection of the rights of cyclists and pedestrians to have permanent access to such amenities for generations to come.”

Finian McGrath TD, an independent serving the area of Dublin North Central, question to the minister had said: “To ask the Minister for Transport, Tourism and Sport if the current compulsory purchase order legislation allows for the compulsory acquisition of farmland for the provision of cycleways; and if he will make a statement on the matter.”

IMAGE: Great Western Greenway, by

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. I wonder who asked the bould TD to ask this question. It seems innocent enough on the surface. However if the anti-CPO, and therefore anti-greenway, lobby requested this then it appears that McGrath doesn’t want greenways either. So he doesn’t want cyclists on the footpath, and rightfully so, and he is happy for off road cycle paths to be blocked by anyone who doesn’t like the idea. I guess the next step is to start screeching about how cyclists on the road are slowing traffic vital for the country and terrifying motorists (they are the most vulnerable people on the road don’t you know) and the only logical solution will be clear. Eliminate cycling altogether.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.