Councillors may cut Belfast Bikes’s 30 minutes free time

UPDATED BELOW

— Move by councillors follows newspaper report that the standard free use time is a “loophole”.

A committee of Belfast City Council are today to decide if they will recommend reducing the free first 30 minutes of Belfast Bikes use down to just 15 minutes.

Hello... sorry to interrupt you: IrishCycle.com is reader-funded journalism supported by just over 250 readers like you -- they have subscribed for €5 per month or more. If you can, please join them and subscribe today. If you have already subscribed -- thank you! Now, back to the article...

Belfast’s system has a free first 30 minutes of use for subscribers, as is standard in most modern on-street bicycle share schemes around the world, including London, Paris, Dublin, Cork, Limerick, and Galway.

The move by councillors follows the Belfast Telegraph newspaper reporting on the free time as a “loophole” rather than standard element of bicycle share.

Local cycling campaigners have asked if Belfast councillors are attempting a “world-first in reduced service”.

“I’ve tried to find a scheme which works on a 15 minute basis, but haven’t managed it so far – is Belfast about to try a world-first in reduced service?,” said a post on bikefast.org last night.

It added: “Will this move to squeeze more revenue from users, and make the scheme less attractive, depress membership levels and push the scheme into a death spiral?”

UPDATE: On Facebook today, BelfastBikefast states: “Under public pressure, councillors have decided *not* to attempt this £15k cut to Belfast Bikes and the free 30 minute period will be retained – well done to everyone who expressed their disbelief and contacted their councillors.”

‪MORE: bikefast.org

IMAGE: Belfastbikes.co.uk

Hello Reader... IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of February, 210 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.3% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers

Cian Ginty
Editor, IrishCycle.com

1 comment

  1. People need to stop taking the media seriously. Any idiot should be able to determine that the 30 minute window is not a loophole and even if they couldn’t be bothered I’m sure if they had asked someone responsible for the scheme they would have been told so.

    I believe the stats show that the majority of trips in Dublin are less than 30 minutes. I wonder how many are less than 15 minutes. Certainly when I was using the scheme this would have been virtually none.

    It is depressing to think that Dublin City Council, desperate to ensure the scheme pays for itself, could follow suit. After all once one idiot has done something then the remaining idiots are just following a precedent. 15 minutes could become ‘best practice’ before we know it.

    Usage drops and the scheme will be considered a failure. There’s just not enough demand for cycling they will say. The scheme may have seemed like it was a huge success but after we messed with it enough nobody was using it.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.