is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Blue boxes painted over Luas tracks aim to safely direct cyclists

Authorities in charge of the Luas tram line extension in Dublin have started to paint markings on streets with the aim of safely directing bicycle users across tracks.

The moves follows recent news of increasing amount of injures linked to bicycle wheels getting caught in or slipping on some of the new tram tracks laid in the city centre. also reported how crossing points of trams for general traffic, including bicycles, were cycling unfriendly.

The new tracks are part of the Luas Cross City project, an extension to the Luas green line from St Stephens Green to Broombridge via some of busiest streets in the city centre and Broadstone and the new DIT campus at Grangegorman.

The extension, which will use longer trams, is due to open at the end of 2017. Before the extension construction started, tram tracks had not run on large sections of main streets mixed with buses, bicycles and general traffic.

Images of a trial of the new crossing point markings were posted on Facebook by the Dublin Cycling Campaign yesterday evening:

The trial pictured above deals with a general crossing point on Parnell Street which we had highlighted as cycling unfriendly.

IMAGE: The previous crossing point for all traffic shown with a red arrow, while the approximate location of the new trial cycling crossing point is shown with a blue arrow. (Image from Luas Cross City released under FOI, with arrows added by this website).

As one of our readers spotted last week, the new markings were hand painted:


You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

ALSO READ: is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. A well intentioned move, but bikes need to cross the rails going straight and at near 90degrees. This means the bike track needs to turn well before crossing the rails. If as in the photo the bike track swerves just before the rails, bikes will cross the rails while turning (a sideways force on front wheel means slipping is more likely) and still at an oblique angle.

  2. Do we know how many NRA staff and contractors have actually used the route to cycle over in the rain, at night?
    Do we know what section of the traffic signs manual this blue hatching is from?

  3. @tdlegge That is an impressive image. My point is more about the turn than the angle: particularly on a wet day you don’t want any lateral force on the front wheel while crossing the rails, so the bike track should allow you to turn and straighten before the rail.

    However, my only bad experience with rails was on a wet day here:
    That angle must be 10-15 degrees at best.

  4. @brendan: good point, yes being pinched into a tight and active turn across the tracks could be risky. Nothing a bit of good road design can’t fix. My bigger concern is that this will turn into another dangerisation of what should be a normal interaction between bicycle and tram


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.