Watch as this Dublin cyclist gets caught breaking a red light

COMMENT & ANALYSIS: A reader sent us this shocking video of a cyclist running a red traffic light:

…despite perception this is not a one-off. If motorists breaking red lights isn’t an issue why do they keep running into Luas trams? Data from a red light traffic camera along the Luas red line shows cars, vans and trucks running red lights a larger problem:

...I'm sorry to disrupt you while you're reading this article, but without messages like this,'s reader-funded journalism won't survive. With nearly 1/2 million views and 300k readers so-far this year, it's not just people who are dedicated to cycling that this website reaches. However, the number of subscribers is around 0.6% of readers. While having a large gap between readers/subscribers is standard for non-paywall reader-supported journalism, IrishCycle's journalism needs more support. Don't delay, support monthly or yearly today. Now, back to the article...

IMAGE: Via the Kerry Cycling Campaign : Cyclists account for only 12% of red light jumpers in an area with a high number of cyclists.

There’s a perception issue. It’s like the saying “The finest trick of the devil is to persuade you that he does not exist” — the danger of speeding a motorists breaking red lights is the devil which we are collectively blind to.

I woke up to the issue of motorists breaking red lights not as a cyclist but while pushing my first child around Dublin city centre in a pram — the red light breaking by motorists ranged from at speed to creeping over pedestrian crossing while you were trying to use them with a pram.

And guess what? When I confronted those motorists for driving towards my child in the pram the typical reaction was similar to the reaction people get from cyclists doing the same thing.

We’re all humans regardless of what mode of transport we use on the roads, but there’s collective hysteria over cycling, while our motoring culture has us collectively blind to how serious issues with cars are.

Humans break the law and make mistakes — in cars, vans, trucks and on bicycles. A bit of perspective is needed — a human behind the wheel of a powerful and heavy car or truck has far more changes of causing death and serious injury than the same human on a bicycle.

This is not whataboutery or flinging mud at motorists. We’re not saying it’s ok for cyclists to break the law — nothing in this article should be read as condoning cyclists breaking red light and we support the systems of cyclists getting finned on-the-spot and in court . There’s good reasons why cyclists should stop at red lights — for example, here’s one.

We also have a wider point here: When there’s a campaign for greater safety for cycling — anything from passing distance laws to people looking safer cycling routes — motorists and others say something like “what about cyclists breaking red lights”. Like this letter to The Irish Times:

Far too many people think there’s equivalence in car driving and cycling a bicycle. It’s sad that we have to point this out: Basic physics dictates that a car overtaking a bicycle can endanger the bicycle user, but a bicycle can’t endanger a car user in the same way if they chose to overtake a car which is stopped or slow-moving. And if the car is not turning, there also should be little danger to the cyclist doing the overtaking.

All of this hysteria isn’t just the work of individual letter writers alone. Over time, the anti-cycling rhetoric from pundits and broadcasters — including George Hook, Fintan O’Toole, Olivia O’Leary, Michael O’Leary, etc — has an effect on otherwise reasonable people. Some people disagree with this, but the history of collective hysteria and the marketing and advertising industry should disprove any doubt. We also have state bodies engaging in victim blaming.

Different people and groups pushing to make cycling safer and generally promoting cycling is getting a backlash from our motoring culture. This is not a new trend. When covering the invention of jaywalking, the BBC quotes Peter Norton, a history professor at the University of Virginia.

Norton said that a petition for 40km/h speed limits in Cincinnati in 1923 alarmed the motoring industry so much that it scrambled to shift the blame for pedestrian casualties from drivers to walkers. He told the BBC: “The newspaper coverage quite suddenly changes, so that in 1923 they’re all blaming the drivers, and by late 1924 they’re all blaming jaywalking.” Sound familiar?

It’s the response a large section of our car culture gives when people look for safety measures for walking and cycling.

We started this article with the words shocking in our opening line, but something which is truly shocking is the five hit-and-runs involving motorists since December. But we as a nation have hardly blinked an eye at this behaviour — the recent hit-and-run collision hasn’t engaged the letter pages of the Irish Times, and it hasn’t been mentioned by politicians in the houses of the Oireachtas (only by the Victims’ Rights Alliance).

The details of the five hit-and-runs are as follows: 27th December outside Skerries — man remains in a serious condition in late February; 28th December in Clonberne, Co Galway — a 84 year old pedestrian seriously injured; 16th February in Summerhill County Meath — a man in his 20s was found dead; 17th February on Lincoln Place, Dublin 2 — a luggage door of a coach hit three pedestrians, one described as in a critical condition; and 8th March — Coolock — a man in his 20s suffered serious injuries and later died.

How many cars vs cyclists break red lights in Dublin:

...That's the end of the article. Keep scrolling if you want to the comments, but *NEEDS* readers like you to keep it that way. It only requires a small percentage of readers to give a bit each month or every year to keep's journalism open to all. Thank you.


  1. I was involved with a hit and run with a motorist only yesterday. I was walking. He broke a number of laws. Speeding. Driving without due care and attention. Assault. Endangerment of the child in his car. Breaking a red light (at speed and on the wrong side of the road). Reversing up a main road. And probably numerous others.

    But, you know, bloody non-driverists always breaking the rules.

  2. Well said Cian. I’ve always been of the belief that enforcement of safety is more important than enforcement of laws and that road traffic law should be enforced given priority to those whose symptoms are extreme than those which are perceived to be more prevailent . While not excusing it there is no evidence of widespread carnage , injury or loss is incurred by the public due to cyclists breaking red lights. I’m not perfect in car or on bike but my natural sense of self preservation will insure I don’t break a red light dangerously when cycling.
    Have a look at this video it might give proper erspective on the things that should be enforced.

  3. When people say to me “You never see cars breaking red lights”, I reply “Yes, but you do see cars speeding, driving in bus lanes and stopping 10 feet over the stop line at junctions”. To which the reply is “Okay, fair point”.

    We all witness these bad habits every day. They have a direct relationship to death and injury on the road, far greater than bad cycling habits. This isn’t an excuse to cycle irresponsibly, but please drivers, keep some perspective.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.