Sub-standard share path will make an “excellent cycle route” says Dublin business group

A proposal to include a sub-standard shared pedestrian and cycling path as part of the Liffey Cycle Route will make for a “good compromise” and “excellent cycle route”, according to a statement issued this afternoon by DublinTown, a group which represents city centre businesses.

DublinTown welcomed Option 8 for the route as a solution for the pinch points in the width of the quays around Smithfield, between Blackhall Place and the Four Courts. Solving this problem allows for the full 4.5km two-way Liffey Cycle Route between the Phoenix Park and the Point Village.

...I'm sorry to disrupt you while you're reading this article, but without messages like this,'s reader-funded journalism won't survive. With nearly 1/2 million views and 300k readers so-far this year, it's not just people who are dedicated to cycling that this website reaches. However, the number of subscribers is around 0.6% of readers. While having a large gap between readers/subscribers is standard for non-paywall reader-supported journalism, IrishCycle's journalism needs more support. Don't delay, support monthly or yearly today. Now, back to the article...

IMAGE: Option 8 includes a 2.85 metre path to be shared between pedestrian and cycling. A written report to the council’s transport committee says it will be a shared path.
Dublin City Council has said Option 7 is still the best solution, and most cycling campaigners also favour Option 7.

The solution welcomed by DublinTown includes the two-way cycle route crossing footpaths 7 times in less than 600 metre, shared footpath junctions at the James Joyce and Rory O’More bridge, a traffic-light type bus gate at Queen St which will sometimes slow buses, “Costly” boardwalk-like structures for cycling only, and an 85 metre shared pedestrian and cycling path just 2.85 metres wide.

The proposed 2.85 metres wide shared path and junctions are narrower than minimum width for a “basic two-way” cycle path, with seprate space for pedestrians, as outlined in the National Cycle Manual. On primary routes — which the Liffey Cycle Route is supposed to be — Dutch cycling experts recommend at least 4 metres of a width.

The usable width of the path is narrower than 2.85 metres because people cannot safely cycle too close to the quay wall. The narrow shared path will have no buffer space between it and the car lane running beside it.

Bicycle traffic already outnumber private car at peak times on a number of sections of the quays — including Ellis Quay and Eden Quay. But the proposed section of the cycle route with the shared path will have a bus lane and two traffic lanes, one for cars turning into Blackhall Place and one for cars proceeding straight into Ellis Quay.

The DublinTown statement said: “DublinTown welcomes proposals from Dublin City Council on the latest option for the Liffey Cycle Route. Option 8, which will create space along the Liffey boardwalk for the cycle lane, is a good compromise and is in line with our original submissions on the proposal made in April 2015.”

It added: “This is a sensible solution for all parties, providing an excellent cycle route for cyclists while avoiding the need to re-route motorists almost 2km through residential streets.”

In related news, this morning launched it’s campaign website — which calls for Option 8 to be rejected and Option 7 to be built. The campaign urges members of the public to contact councillors in advance of the Dublin City transport committee meeting tomorrow at 3pm.

The DublinTown statement also covers the council’s U-turn allowing cars onto Eden Quay — a move which transport experts say will affect Luas Cross City and the many bus routes using the quays.

Despite business groups first pressuring the council to allow cars to remain on Bachelor’s Walk and now also allowing cars to remain on Eden Quay, DublinTown said it “still has concerns regarding the proposed changes to Eden Quay and the process being used to make these changes.” The group said: “We are not convinced that the right process is being used and we will be seeking significant clarification in relation to this.”

The DublinTown board includes representatives from Dublin City Council, Stephen’s Green Shopping Centre,  Ilac Centre, McDonalds, Brown Thomas, Penneys, Bewleys, The Westbury Hotel, Carroll’s Irish Gifts, David McMahon & Company, FFA Chartered Accountants, Fade Street Social and Rustic Stone restaurants, and The Flowing Tide pub.


...That's the end of the article. Keep scrolling if you want to the comments, but *NEEDS* readers like you to keep it that way. It only requires a small percentage of readers to give a bit each month or every year to keep's journalism open to all. Thank you.


  1. In other news: Dublin Town opposes washing of hands in hospitals, citing unreliable sources that spitting in your hands and giving them a bit of a rub is just as good in preventing the spread of bacteria.

  2. Does Dublin Town do anything other than ensure people are not hampered in their god given right to drive their cars right up to anything they want at any time they want?

  3. This will not be excellent, at best it will be “moderate”. Anyone who has walked or cycled through the pinchpoint at Leeson St bridge on the Grand Canal will tell you how awfull these are. We need non-cyclists on board to demand segregstion too.

    If this watered down proposal is approved it will show a real lack of ambition by the city, and justified as a “sensible compromise”. Change is hard, and sometimes needs to be pushed through.

    We have a history of doing things by halves in Ireland, when introducing transport infrastructure (roads/rail/luas/greenways). As a consequence, we spend a fortune on redesign and re-engineering 10 years later. This is driven by a lack of foresight and an over-cautious approach at the outset.

    It seems the problem here is with councillors, who are being influenced by some dubious arguements.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.