is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Hold vote to allow visual impaired people to use Dublin’s cycle lanes, says lord mayor

Dublin’s lord mayor, Cllr Brendan Carr, said he “is considering asking Dubliners to vote on whether people with disabilities should be allowed use cycle lanes in the city”, according to a statement issued via the Dublin City Council press office this morning.

The statement outlined how this would include people with “visual and mobility disabilities”. But according to the Road Traffic Acts, electric wheelchairs are already allowed to use cycle tracks of all types, so, the proposed measure is likely to mainly apply to people who have visual impairments when they are pedestrians.

IMAGE: Sometimes cycle lanes are more cluttered than footpaths, such as this example on the Finglas Road.

Dublin City Council press release said: “The Lord Mayor of Dublin Brendan Carr has announced that he is considering asking Dubliners to vote on whether people with disabilities should be allowed use cycle lanes in the city. This is prompted by the increasing number of pavement obstacles that people with visual and mobility disabilities have to navigate in Dublin City on a daily basis.”

A quote attributed to Cllr Carr (Labour) said: “Currently, we are aware of the extent to which people with disabilities have to go to circumnavigate obstructions on the pavements. I think they would be better off using the cycle lanes and would like to ask what the people of Dublin think about this.”

We have attempted to email and phone the city council press office and Cllr Carr for clarification on the nature of the vote, as well as to confirm if the lord mayor is aware that electric wheelchairs and similar mobility aids are already allowed to use cycle tracks, and why the suggestion seem to contradict the position of the NCBI, the sight loss charity.

The NCBI policy looks for segregation between walking and cycling, and its representative on the city council’s transport committee has voiced opposition to shared paths and cycle paths which are not clearly defined.

We also asked Cllr Carr if he is aware that cycle lanes often stop and start, and are mixed with or dump people using them into heavy traffic.

Cllr Carr replied in a message before midday today and asked if he could contact us later. We asked when should we expect such a response, but have yet to hear back from the lord mayor. We’ll update this story if he responds.

The lord mayor is no stranger to controversy on cycling issues. Another councillor branded Cllr Carr’s comments implying that people on bicycles never cycled home with bags of shopping as “ridiculous and offence”, those comments also resulted in a surge in the use of the #shopbybike hashtag by Dublin residents on Twitter. He also claimed that “cyclists get everything they want” in a sub-standard solution for the Liffey Cycle Route. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Is this for real?
    I wonder if he’s playing politics. Knowing that throwing visually impaired people in a space in which quiet moving objects will be going through, it guarantees conflicts. If his political schtick is anti-cycling, he can then respond to these conflicts by claiming that cyclists are not considerate of these poor impaired people.
    Some voters might buy it.

  2. New mayor maybe but Carr will remain a councillor. The mayor has no real additional power, he is just the councillor selected to do ribbon cutting and give speeches. He will have just as much ability to sabotage cycling in the city in a few weeks, we just won’t be as aware of it.

    In fact I think Carr being mayor has done us a favour in one way. His attitude is so crazy that he may be making regular people think outside the “cyclists are all selfish, lycra clad scofflaws” box that the media has encouraged them in to. Certainly it seems that his (and the whole council’s) antics have pushed the cycling groups and the NCBI in to an alliance.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.