is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Evidence shows cycle lanes should not be mandatory says RSA

Based on Irish and international evidence, cycle tracks should not mandatory for people cycling to use, the Road Safety Authority told the Department of Transport a year ago. 

Cycle tracks are the legal name for cycle lanes and most types of cycle paths in Ireland. The law was change in 2012 to remove mandatory use of cycle tracks for bicycle users, but the department have since claimed that there is an error in the legislation which invalidated the intent of the law change. Cycling groups have rejected this view.

The view of the RSA is likely to be welcomed by cycling groups, but it is unclear if recommended further research will change the position. 

According to records released to under the Freedom of Information Acts, the Road Safety Authority (RSA) said: “Overall, have considered the available Irish and international evidence, the RSA does not believe that cycle tracks should be mandatory without consideration to the following:”

“Further research should be conducted in Ireland to understand cycle lane usage by cyclists, their safety benefits, and cyclist/motorists attitudes towards usage.”

“Other cyclist safety measures should be considered to improve cyclist safety, particularly the reduction in speed limits in urban areas with or without cycle lanes where there is a high throughput of cyclist traffic.”

“The Department of Transport, Tourism and Sport should, in collaboration with Local Authorities and TII as appropriate, undertake and engineering assessment to review current cycle lanes with regard to effectiveness, safety (keeping a minimum of 1.5 metre distance) and maintenance, as well as intersection with junctions and roundabouts.”

We reported in March of this year that the RSA maintained that it’s “inappropriate” to reveal cost of research into cycle tracks.

The Department of Transport now has the results of the research, but on August 16th refused to release it under Freedom of Information (FOI), saying that it will be released after Minister Shane Ross makes a decision on the issue. has requested a review of the refusal to release the documents.

FOI documents: Schedule and files records released:

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Well so, the ‘research’ has been concluded. Do we know who carried out this ‘research’? Surely that information should be open to the public.

  2. I have to say I’m very surpised, but pleasantly so. It seems like it would be uncontroversial that cyclists should not be forced to use substandard or dangerous cycle paths but everything the DoT, GSA and RSA have done up until now has made me think they could not see that. I guess we just need to get the DoT and GSA to see the obvious now.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.