is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Approval of low-quality Dodder Greenway is not great news for cycling in Dublin

COMMENT AND ANALYSIS: Councillors in South Dublin County Council have voted to approve the Dodder Greenway in their area, but the bad news is that the design is nowhere near as good as it should be.

Council officials rejected a call from one councillor for better segregation. There two issues with segregation — that between pedestrians and cycling and between cycling and motoring.

The Manual for Urban Roads and Streets, and the National Cycle Manual are being walked on — going against the guidance, left hand  slip turns and staggered crossings remain in designs where crossings are being revamped.

But the guidance in Irish manuals also remains poor or lacking in terms of shared surfaces and designing segregation like the Dutch do.

Here’s a sample of the plans for the Dodder by South Dublin County Council:

Most of the greenway is between 3-4 metres wide of a shared path — this might sound good compared to rural greenways but the goal for a two-way cycle path in busy areas should 4 metres. 

Needlessly mixing walking and cycling on this route is going to cause more conflict — this route is mostly in a highly urban area and linked to areas with relatively high use of cycling for transport and leisure.

There’s no reason for not having segregation of walking and cycling along most of the route:

And the council is fine with leaving people who cycle unprotected at large junctions which the route intersects with — cycling safety is put far below traffic capacity here:

Slip turns and staggered crossings, and crossings only on one side of junctions: 

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Poor widths and few or no buffers between the greenway paths where such link in with footpaths:

A roundabout with zebra crossings where cyclists must dismount:

Cycle track, cycle lane, shared path and then a toucan crossing on the narrow side of a junction — that makes sense.

Rather than take space from cars or bog standard grass, it seems to be a case of let’s mix walking and cycling:
These twists and bends on this shared path are clearly not designed for cycling or to minimise conflict:

What is this?…

There’s lots of sillyness, like where the route goes from a side road into a main road, the crossing is on the wrong side for people cycling out of the side road: is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.