No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Fitzwilliam Cycle Route facing further delay and disconnection from Grand Canal Route

— Progress on cycle routes in Dublin too slow and routes must not be left disconnected, says Dublin Cycling Campaign.

Dublin City’s planned Fitzwilliam Cycle Route could be both delayed again, and be left disconnected from the Grand Canal Cycle Route possibly for years, a council document outlines.

As reported last month the project was one of a few routes which was already delayed. According to Dublin City Council, the new delay is due to the National Transport Authority.

The route was original due to be finished for June 2019 ahead of the Velo-City conference.

A Dublin City Council document, the Monthly Management Report for October 2019, outlines how the National Transport Authority (NTA) has raised a number of issues with the cycle route project.

It states: “Fitzwilliam Cycle Route: The NTA has raised a number of issues with the project that require to be resolved before proceeding, including curtailing the project on approach to Leeson St junction, and not providing connectivity to Grand Canal Cycle Route. This will mean that the advanced works package cannot proceed, and further engagement will be required if the scheme is to change which will result in project delivery delay.”

Commenting on the report, Kevin Baker, chairman of the Dublin Cycling Campaign, said: “This project, just like the Royal Canal and Clontarf cycle route, have been delayed again and again. The Royal Canal was approved December 2015 and most of it hasn’t even started construction yet. Progress is too slow.”

He added: “We need a connected network of safe segregated cycle routes. Not connecting the FitzWilliam Cycle Route to the canal cycle route at Lesson Street misses the mark and will fail to create a city that is safe for people all ages and all abilities to cycle.” is asking the NTA for clarity and comment on this issue. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. It’s clear what’s happened here. The NTA must have pulled rank and said “you can’t design it like that, we’ve got something else in mind for Bus Connects along there”. Which means yet another project getting caught up in Bus Connects. The top priority for Bus Connects designers should be to work with local authorities to get the right designs in that are forward-compatible with the Bus Connects designs. This would show good faith and help to incrementally grow cyclist and public transport numbers while very deliberately reducing private car use between the canals.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.