No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Ban on parents driving to school: “…he said in response to a hypothetical policy question”

COMMENT & ANALYSES: “…he said in response to a hypothetical policy question” — that was the line buried at the end of the forth paragraph of an Irish Times article on Monday. The article had the headline of “Dublin council official calls for ban on parents driving children to school” and opening paragraph of: “Parents should be legally prohibited from driving their children to school, a senior Dublin City Council official has told a clean air conference.”

The reaction online and in follow up coverage by other outlets was strong, to say the least. Newspapers cannot generally be responsible for secondary coverage of their stories, but they can when the stories are framed in such a misleading way.

We are told the context of the hypothetical question was a “if you were dictator for a day” type of question. It should never make into a newspaper as if it was a serious suggestion. Not a serious newspaper anyway. If you’re responding to a hypothetical question, you’re not “calling” for something. The headline and opening paragraph combined are highly misleading.

Even if people read as far as the reference to the hypothetical question, the headline and opening paragraph have left their mark.

The quote was from Brendan O’Brien, the head of the transport section of Dublin City Council. Even when O’Brian was on RTÉ Radio One’s Drivetime show and explained that it was a hypothetical question, the presenter and another guest continued mainly as if it was a real suggestion.

In The Irish Times article, it’s only in the 9th paragraph where we get told of the point of the event which the journalist was covering — Dublin is the first Irish city to agree to aim to meet the Health Organisation air quality guidelines by 2030. offers an example of a different way of covering the same story: ‘Air quality drive could hand Dublin roads to green transport’. But that headline is clearly not as click friendly.

Some staff of the newspaper have in the past taken criticism badly, mainly evident by their reaction on Twitter. But we have to say that this is not a one-off in how The Irish Times covers sustainable transport and related issues.

Relevant to the subject at hand, last year, we covered how The Irish Times was particularly poor on air quality and its link with cars — it called for more monitoring when EPA data shows there’s a large problem linked with motor traffic, and it’s well beyond time for action.

Why does this matter? Because it gets people’s back up for no reason when there is no real call for what the headline claims there is. It’s debases the conversion on what to do when Dublin is starting to seriously look at issues as what happens around the school gates and how to provide alternatives.

Providing alternatives is hardly every a straight forward thing was wished by a wide range of people (ie the concept a city can wait until, for example, there’s underground metro routes cross-crossing it’s suburbs), so, muddying the waters more with misleading information hinders change.

ALSO READ: How The Irish Times covers sustainable transport and related issues. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.