is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

BusConnects review: Route 1: Clongriffin route: Part A: Clongriffin and Belmayne

COMMENT & ANALYSIS: plans to try to look at all of the revised BusConnects Core Bus Corridors, which are the on-street infrastructure changes which includes cycle routes. These articles will aim to inform the public and made up a submission that the routes should follow standards.

This kind of infrastructure will last for decades. Now is the time to the detail right to kick start cycling for all across Dublin — enabling everybody from school children to retirees and everybody in between using the Dutch system of systematic safety.

There’s sixteen corridors so we’re in trying to cover all the routes by the closing date for the consultation on April 17, 2020. We might miss things or get things wrong, please comment below if you have suggestions. There’s more details at

The article is split into sections as follows:

This is the overall map for this route:

This is the key / legend for the drawings:

North Fringe — Clongriffin and Belmayne

The areas of the North Fringe — ie Clongriffin and Belmayne etc — are all relatively recently built. But are overall desperate in terms of car-focused streets which are not friendly to play, community development or active travel. This applies to both local streets and the main roads.

It is not something we can go into much further detail in this article — but there’s a load of issues. For example: car-parking and car-movement dominated layouts, lack of bicycle storage at a huge percentage of houses in the area, footpaths in many cases with some streets lined with car parking inside the footpaths, full car permeability in most cases, excessive hard surfaces, in some cases too few formal car parking spaces given the average suburban car ownership per house resulting in cars parked on footpaths, some one-way streets with no provision for cycling in both directions, service and other streets left unconnected / with dead ends, and more.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Both developers and planners have a lot to answer for in this. Urgent action is needed at a high level to stop these kind of layouts from being built — maybe the Manual for Urban Roads and Streets needs further firming up or reviewed?


With the BusConnects route, it starts at Clongriffin train station or, more so, the large roundabout / underground park and ride posing as a town square of sorts. The plan for BusConnects is to leave this as is for both walking and cycling — which is a really poor call given that this is not just a bus hub but also a Dart / Commuter train station and village centre:

Here is the current BusConnects drawing for the start of the route… maybe somebody will care enough to retro-fit cycling and priority crossing for people who are pedestrians here?

Below is Main Street which will also be left as it is now — around 600 metres of urban centre dual carrageway before there’s a cycle track. More on-street car parking without a cycle path is planned on the right in the below Google Street View image.

This layout will cause more issues for not just walking and cycling but also buses once the area is fully built out and there’s more activity (people driving around, stopping outside shops, loading etc).

THIS APPLIES TO THE LAYOUT OF MOST OF THE ROUTE: In other countries standard practice where bus priority is high on the agenda is to have buses running in the centre of the road or to one side. It’s unclear why the NTA refuses to take such designs seriously when they are proven to work better than kerb-side bus lanes. Such designs also break up larger roads better and slow cars by design.

If they are going to keep the first 600-700 metres free of any cycling provision, they need to at least fix the transition from cycle path to shared bus lane:

The text says “no works proposed for this section of main street” yet the drawings include the suggestion of raised tables at junctions and relocated bus stops.

Putting up 30km/h signs or adding logos on the road and hoping for the best rarely works:

And, after the above was written in a draft of this article, the following was posted on Twitter which shows the electric sign on the other side of the road closer to the train station:

These are the bus stops just before Main Street meets the Hole in The Wall Road and the side road here is the entrance to the Trinity Sports & Leisure Club & Bar and a montessori.

The bus stop pass location is too close to the side road and for cycling and pedestrian safety it should be moved back:

Furthermore the cycle track should remain at a raised level across any side road or entrance like this — as is planned for pedestrians:

At the Hole in The Wall Road junction the design type used is a weird hybrid design of a protected junction — the modern Dutch protected junction design is safer and more attractive than this.

This video explains Dutch protected junction design:

Note: The roundabout designs also shown would generally not be suitable for the planned core bus routes in Dublin:

Parking is to be removed on this section to fit in cycle tracks of 2m wide — this is the best section yet. But, again, the cycle tracks should be raised at side streets and entrances.


The section on the second last image above notes: “THIS SECTION OF PARTIALLY CONSTRUCTED ROAD WILL BE

Here’s two example sections which we will not comment on here as the scheme already is progressing:

NOTE: While on the same stretch on road in the same direction, the orientation with these drawings is different — on the BusConnects drawings we moving from left to right while these drawings are moving from right to left:

This scheme brings us as far as the Malahide Road which is pictured to the left here:

Continue >>> is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.