No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Cycling group wants safer junction design for Swords bypass plan

— Consultation ends today at midnight.

— Campaigners say designs of junctions “unacceptable” and that Dutch-style junctions should be used.

Fingal County Council‘s plan to revamp the R132 Swords bypass, which itself was bypassed by the M1 motorway, has been welcomed by cycling campaigners.

Although campaigners are looking for improvements in the design, better segregation between the walking and cycling areas planned, care to be taken with minor junction design, and that bus stop bypasses to be used at bus stops.

The deadline for submissions is today December 18 at 11.59pm via the council’s website.

Writing a submission for Fingal Cycling, the Fingal branch of the Dublin Cycling Campaign, Alan Downey said: “The area of highest concern for all people who cycle is the point at which they are required to interact with motorised traffic. In order to enable people of all ages and abilities to cycle in safety, these conflicts must be designed out to the fullest extent possible. We see that on straight sections this is achieved with simple kerb and bollard solutions but at junctions it becomes more of a concern.”

IMAGE: What the council is proposing, which is a type of Dublin-style “protected” junction.

Downey said: “Our concern with junction design is how it designs in and forces conflict between cyclists and motorists and we have seen this in action at Lombard St in Dublin 2. In the proposed design motorists and cyclists proceed on the same green, save for the provision of a short ‘advanced green’ that benefits only the people cycling who arrive at the junction during a ‘red phase’.”

“For all other cyclists who are proceeding on green, they must contend with left turning traffic, drivers who are likely to be in slow moving columns and not expecting a cyclist to proceed on their left with right of way.
The small island at the junction can place the cyclist in the A-pillar or B-pillar blind spot of motorists leading to a dangerous situation of a driver turning left, physically unable to see the cyclists, not expecting them and believing they have right of way due to the green light phase,” said he said.

The group said that so-called “left hook” collisions and near-misses are a common experience of many people cycling in Dublin due to the dangerous design at junctions.

“This type of junction, through its appearance of safety, may draw an inexperienced or low confidence cyclist into a false sense of security,” said Downey.

Downey added: “Our proposals for addressing this are to adopt the learnings and practices, and not just visuals, of the Dutch style of design. There are other design options available such as cyclops which also offer more protection for cyclists and equal benefits for pedestrians.”

IMAGES ABOVE: Dutch-style design which campaigners want used.

IMAGES BELOW: Dublin-style junction which the council plans to use. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.