No paywall and let's keep it that way. Support reader-funded journalism, subscribe today.

Midleton cycling and walking plan dominated by “unwelcome and unnecessary” shared paths

A walking and cycling plan for Midletonon and Ballinacurra which heavily relies on shared paths — mixing people walking and cycling — will increase the likelihood of collisions, the Cork Cycling Campaign has warned.

The cycling campaign said it welcomed the idea of upgrading the cycling provision in the area but that there’s too much of a reliance on shared paths.

The campaign also raised a number of other issues including the need for raised crossings and better connections. It said that much of the details of the plans falls fowl of the National Cycle Manual and the Manual For Urban Roads and Streets.

IMAGE: One of the junctions on the project where walking and cycling is mixed on shared footpaths.

The Pedestrian and Cycle Route from Ballinacurra to Midletonon is planned by Cork Council Council includes about 3.4km of shared paths which are little more than footpaths where cycling will be allowed on and about 2.5km of shared urban greenway paths, but only around 1.7km of segregated cycle paths.

The below map is an overview of sections of routes planned by Cork County Council. The public consultation ended tonight (Wednesday).


  • Purple: Shared footpath
  • Yellow: Shared greenway
  • Green: Cycle path
  • Light green: Two-way cycle path

“National Cycle Manual, (section 1.9.3) gives great detail on why segregation is the best option. We can furnish the Council and designers with many further reasons that shared infrastructure provides a poor result,” said the Cork Cycling Campaign, in its submission. “In short neither pedestrians nor cyclists want shared infrastructure.”

In its submission, it said: “If the Council progresses with a shared scheme as currently proposed, against the recommendations of the National Cycle Manual (and against our recommendations as key cycling stakeholders): We believe there will certainly be collisions between cyclists and pedestrians; that injuries will result from collisions; that the proposed design will be partially at fault, due to the lack of segregation and that the proposed design presents unnecessary risk, where that risk can be easily avoided.”

Stills from a promotional video for the project show artist impressions of shared paths — some of which look as if people cycling are just cycling on footpaths.

On a section of the project which starts at Midleton train station (where the Midleton to Youghal greenway starts) and goes to the centre of Midleton, the campaign said: “Having visited and measured for ourselves, we are confident that there is ample space available throughout the vast majority of the scheme area such that this chosen ‘last resort’ [shared paths] design type is not required and has been chosen for design convenience only.”

The campaign added: “Should the proposed shared-use paths go ahead, we would like to state for the record that the unnecessary choice of this design type with its many well-known and well-documented issues may result in collisions between pedestrians and cyclists. We believe that the design choice will be partially at fault in any such collisions. This may have legal implications for Cork County Council in civil cases.” is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

September subscription drive update: has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. it is great to see cyclists and pedestrians agreeing for once no shared space and raised wombat style crossings. A great article cian now just to get dublin cycling campaign to say the same

  2. @Martin — Happy Christmas…

    I’ve said this to you and others before: There’s no cycle campaign I know of that wants shared space footpaths. There are a few design things which some people claim are shared space but aren’t, like bus stop bypasses.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.