COMMENT & ANALYSIS: Please excuse my clickbait headline, it’s designed to make a point.
Another year and another misleading article from The Irish Times on cycling and helmets — the headline “Cycling the biggest activity for referrals to brain unit” is inaccurate because the research covered excludes pedestrians. Last time I checked, walking is an activity.
The research, titled ‘Sports & exercise related traumatic brain injury in the Republic of Ireland – The neurosurgical perspective‘ for some reason extracts cycling road traffic collisions and lumps them in with cycling sporting injuries without also looking at overall road traffic collisions.
Why isn’t walking included? And if we’re mixing sport and transport, will we also look at motoring and motorsport? Having poor or limited data isn’t a good reason to present limited research in isolation.
The conclusion of the paper states:
Our findings demonstrate that sport and exercise related TBI is associated with significant morbidity and mortality across a wide
variety of sporting activities in Ireland and maybe associated with a significant morbidity and mortality.
There’s no conclusions on helmet wearing. With the data and level of research provided such conclusions would be impossible. Yet with a limited data set the authors seem to keep trying to make that link.
Two of the cycling deaths mentioned in the article and were linked to collisions involving cars, which research indicates helmets have an even lower chance of being helpful.
The researchers note: “The current debate regarding helmet legislation should not be used in isolation but in conjunction with a concerted effort to significantly improved the cycling infrastructure.” Yet their paper is yet another hint at helmets which is a distraction to all-round cycling safety focused on preventing all types of collisions, including head injuries.
Hello Reader... IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.
There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!
Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.
I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.
The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of February, 210 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!
But currently, it's only around 1.3% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers