is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

“Olympic levels of gaslighting”: Dublin City councillor supports cycle route objectors, calls campaigners “not pro-cycling”

— Councillor’s remarks are “one of the most outrageous land-grabs on the term ‘pro-cycling’” claims cycling campaigners.

A Dublin City councillor, Cllr Dermot Lacey (Labour) — who voted in two consecutive years against holding public consultation on a walking and cycling route aimed at school children — has claimed that campaigners are “not pro-cycling” but “anti-car” and claimed that nobody was against the Strand Road cycle route.

Despite Dublin City Council and others holding a view that an appeal of the Strand Road judgement is needed because it is flawed and would have wide impacts if it stands, Cllr Lacey has claimed an appeal isn’t needed and expressed annoyance that the South East local area committee was not consulted about the appeal.

The claims were published in a news article, published without any context of Cllr Lacey’s record, in The Irish Times. Cllr Lacey has repeatedly called campaigners and members of the public liars when they raise his voting record on Twitter.

The Irish Times also blanking reported claims from Cllr Lacey that a trial cycle Route was possible in Sandymount with a “short stretch”of the route using the footpath and another stretch mixing with motor traffic on the road, without reporting how Dublin City Council, the National Transport Authority, cycling campaigners and disabilities campaigners view such an option as unacceptable due to safety and other issues.

Cllr Lacey told The Irish Times: “This was never about the cycleway. I don’t know anybody who opposed a cycleway here, but it was always meant to be inside the promenade not on the road. That has been the plan for the last 20-odd years.”

In a phrase echoing the now infamous and much derided ‘I’m cyclist myself’ — which is commonly used by cycle route objectors in Ireland, the UK, and the US — Cllr Lacey told the newspaper that he cycles “every day of the week” but that he is branded as anti-cycling by some campaigners.

Cllr Lacey said: “A lot of cycle campaigners are not pro-cycling, they are anti-car. Being motivated by being against things never works.”

The Irish Times also reported how former Lord Mayor, Cllr Hazel Chu (Green Party), who chaired a community forum on the cycle route, said it wasn’t possible to find a solution everybody was happy with.

“We really tried to find a solution…” said Cllr Chu, but groups opposing the route had a stance of “‘we don’t want this to happen, and how can we stop it from happening’ rather than how do we find solutions to particular issues.”

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Responding to Cllr Lacey, Dublin Commuter Coalition, a group which campaigns for sustainable transport, said: “If you only support a plan that hasn’t been built after 20 years and may never be built, you’re just opposing.“

The group said: “Regardless of the impact of the judgement on Strand Road, Dublin City Council should absolutely appeal sections of the ruling. The expectations placed on Local Authorities by some of this judgment frustrates their ability to deliver road traffic infrastructure under Section 38.”

The Dublin Commuter Coalition said: “Just because you cycle ‘every day of the week’ does not mean your opinion on cycling provision should be venerated.”

The group added: “There exists and has for a while, people who cycle who are happy with the status quo. Cycling advocates who disagree with you are not being over the top. They are not ‘anti-car’ or being unreasonable. Just because you feel okay cycling ‘every day of the week’ in painted lanes that does not mean everyone else must also. Cycling advocates advocate for infrastructure than be used by people of all ages and abilities.”

The Dublin Cycling Campaign said: “This is one of the most outrageous land-grabs on the term ‘pro-cycling’ we’ve ever seen.”

It added: “Not only are those who oppose cycle routes calling themselves ‘pro-cycling’, they’re now claiming that cycle campaigners are not pro-cycling. Olympic levels of gaslighting by Cllr Lacey Dermot.” is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

1 comment

  1. Cllr Lacey is a sealioning ‘I’m a cyclist myself’ obstructionist. He has demonstrated on multiple occasions that he’ll support safe segregated cycle infra ONLY when the car-dominated status quo isn’t changed. Similar to climate change delayers, he supports multiple rounds of consultations to the detriment of actually getting anything done. The S2S south should have been built 20 years ago, but it wasn’t precisely because of people like Lacey.

    All the recognized cycle campaign groups need to issue a statement to media outlets that they regard Cllr Lacey as obstructionist towards safe cycle infra. This is needed to counter any interviews he gives in the future with regards to cycle infra. If such a statement is issued then any future interviewers will find it hard not to reference it.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.