is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

“The message is going out that Dublin is a hostile place for cars”

COMMENT & ANALYSIS: Before I say anything more, consider the following two quotes in an Irish Times article today titled “Wealthy shoppers deterred from Dublin city, says business group”:

Martin Deniau of Monte-Cristo antiques and collectibles shop in the Powerscourt Centre:

“A lot of the small boutiques in the city centre would have a high proportion of mature customers, who are well heeled and living in wealthy suburban areas. Many of that generation don’t cycle and don’t want to take crummy buses with bottles and cans rolling down the aisles.”

Mary Whelan, of Eirlooms Irish craft shop of Stephen’s Street:

“Some people need to drive. Especially rural people who would be very used to being able to park straight outside a shop. We are excluding a whole section of the country. The city belongs to everybody, walkers, cyclists and drivers – not always in equal measure, but the city has to remain accessible to all, and the message is going out that Dublin is a hostile place for cars.”

The reporter even wrote before this quote that: “She [the shop owner] said she did not expect drivers to be treated on a par with pedestrians, but there had to be balance.”

Now consider the main elements of what has actually happened in the city centre since the pandemic:

  • Around 300 metres new pedestrianisation around Grafton Street.
  • Temporary/ time limited trial of  pedestrianisation on Capel Street and Parliament Street.
  • A minimal amount of pedestrian build-outs on other streets.
  • Stop-start segregation of existing narrow cycle lane and minimal upgrades of some routes.

And consider what was agreed by councillors before the pandemic and still a work in progress progress:

  • The non-continuous Interim Liffey Cycle Route. This stop-start / non-continuous project improves some sections of the quays, but leaves cycling on large sections of the quays in bus lanes mixing with taxis and buses. It is a compromise option agreed over another option which would have looked much like DLRCC’s Coastal Mobility Route.

Just to be clear:

  • Not a single off-street car park has closed.
  • Not a single continuous cycle route has been provided in the city centre or from the city centre the full way to the canals.
  • A very small percentage of on-street car parking has been removed for Covid-19 measures — much of it only a certain times (ie Capel Street).

For the record:

  • The Irish Times article was published about 13 hours ago.
  • The latest IPCC report warning we’re not doing enough to decarbonise all sectors of our society was published around 5 hours ago.

Will transport in Ireland be harder to decarbonise than meat and dairy farming? is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. “….customers, who are well heeled…” The corollary being that the rest who don’t drive are low-lives. And whoever said this clearly doesn’t see anything odd or wrong with what they said. SMH.

  2. Unbelievable guff from some shop owners!
    All the high-end stores organise home deliveries so why the pandering to a particular entitled set of customers?

  3. On the back of the UN report yesterday you would think there would be more of an incentive to provide safe cycling access in Dublin. Instead, we’re cutting down trees all over the city for a bus network that is only used in rush hour by a relatively small number of people. How many of these would choose to cycle if it was safer? The inertia is soul destroying


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.