Hello to all readers of IrishCycle.com,

This website is reader-funded journalism. It won't survive without your help. IrishCycle covers more than just cycling, and with over 917,000 views so far this year, it's not just "avid cyclists" who read the articles, but if you want it to keep going, more support is needed from readers like you. IrishCycle's future depends on you joining the 400 current subscribers. And please read on for the article...

Thank you,

Cian Ginty
Editor, IrishCycle.com

Strand Road cycle path judgment expected at least 20 months after last Court hearing

A judgment in the Strand Road cycle path Court of Appeal case is expected at least 20 months after the last hearing of the case at the Four Courts in Dublin, the Court Services has confirmed.

The appeal case taken by Dublin City Council is against the High Court ruling in favour of Peter Carvill, of the Serpentine Avenue, Tritonville and Claremont Roads (STC) group, and Cllr Mannix Flynn (independent), who took the case against the council against a plan for a two-way cycle path on Strand Road in Sandymount.

The Courts Services told this website that a date for the judgment will be set in October. A spokesperson for the Courts Service said: “The Court has indicated it will give a date for the judgment in this matter after the new legal year starts in October.”

The Court of Appeal is expected to rise this Thursday, July 31, and return for a new term from October 7th until December 20th. Fewer judgments are published when courts are on holiday.

The case is seen as significant as the first legal challenge to Section 38 of the Road Traffic Act 1994, as amended by Section 46 of the Public Transportation Regulation Act 2009. Section 38 is the central legal provision that allows councils to make roads and streets safer and more attractive for walking and cycling, as well as provide bus priority measures.

National authorities have said that Section 38 should be the legal means of implementing measures such as cycle paths and bus gates, but because of the court case, some local authorities have opted for slower and more expensive methods such as Part 8.

The High Court Case was heard by Justice Charles Meenan in 2021, who was appointed to the Court of Appeal last year. While the Court of Appeal hearing was presided over by High Court President David Barniville, now Supreme Court Justice Maurice Collins, and Justice Mary Faherty.

As reported at the time, at the last court hearing, President of the High Court, David Barniville, said it was a “critical issue” in the High Court judgement that it was not accepted that the Strand Road trial was temporary even after a start date and a 6-month timeframe were outlined by the council in its traffic signs order and elsewhere.

Justice Collins also said that it is significant for the council and Brendan O’Brien, head of the council’s transport department, that his evidence was dismissed by the High Court without reason.

Court of Appeal Justices also complained about the lack of Government guidelines covering Section 38 of the Road Traffic Acts. This was fixed last October when new guidelines clarified Irish councils’ powers to install cycling and bus priority measures permanently or as a trial under Section 38.

The Strand Road 6-month trial project included public consultation, but the new guidelines now outline that consultation only needs to start during such trials.

TIMELINE OF COVERAGE:

2020

2021

2022

2023

2024

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.