is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

“Reality check” needed says road safety campaigner after senior Garda wants to ticket people for not wearing high-vis

IMAGE ABOVE: A car detected speeding while past people cycling with high-vis on.

Road safety campaigners have written to members of the Galway City Joint Policing Committee after a senior Gardai officer said he wanted to give points to people who did not wear high-vis jackets while using public roads and streets.

Last month, the Galway City Tribune reported that Garda Chief Superintendent Tom Curley wanted to give people penalty points for not wearing high-vis. The newspaper reported: “Chief Supt Curley said he’d love to be able to issue ‘penalty points’ to people who don’t wear high-vis jackets but some people might not be happy with that scenario.”

The Galway-based Community Road Safety Action & Information Network (Cosain) said that there is a “reality check is needed” around the benefits of high-vis.

“At the last meeting the Chief Supt expressed his frustration at not being able to give pedestrians penalty points for not wearing hi-vis,”Cosain PRO Simon Comer wrote to members of the Galway City Joint Policing Committee saying. “There is a commonly-held view that cyclists and pedestrians are somehow being careless or even negligent if they wear only their ordinary clothing while out cycling and walking. However, the evidence that hi-vis material reduces death and injury among cyclists and pedestrians is not well established and indeed is somewhat complicated or even contradictory.”

Cosain points out that a 2006 study stated that the effect of such visibility aids on pedestrian and cyclist safety was “unknown”, while a study from New Zealand published in the European Journal of Public Health last year, concluded that “conspicuity aids may not be effective in preventing bicycle–motor vehicle crashes in New Zealand, particularly in Auckland, where attention conspicuity is low.”

“A more recent experimental intervention in Denmark, sponsored by an insurance company, claimed to find a lower ‘multi-party’ crash risk among cyclists wearing a fluorescent yellow jacket, but also saw an increased “solo” crash risk among the same ‘hi-vis’ group”, Comer said.

He added: “A study of 850,000 police-reported motor vehicle crashes in Australia during 1987-2004 found that black, blue, grey, green, red and silver vehicles had a significantly higher crash risk than white vehicles. Yet nobody is suggesting that drivers of non-white motor vehicles be given penalty points as a punishment for their colour preferences.”

Comer said: “A reality check is needed here. In terms of general road safety, the real risk comes from motor vehicles, especially those driven at excessive speed or in an otherwise dangerous manner. Public policy and official pronouncements should be oriented accordingly.”

MORE: High-vis on cyclists unlikely to stop dangerous overtaking
MORE: Fine Gael Senator wants to criminalise cycling without high-vis on rural roads
MORE: High-vis can’t solve drivers’ inattentional blindness and its promotion has failed

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. RSA press release today has the following quote from the RSA’s CE Moyagh Murdock ““Cyclists need to be vigilant too at junctions and to watch for cars making a turn and give plenty of room for them to do so. Cyclists should never travel without adequate lighting, and should always wear a helmet and luminous clothing such as hi-vis vests,”


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.