COMMENT & ANALYSIS: This is the third article in a series looking at potential cycle routes to trial following the question: Should Dublin trial a protected cycle network even if it means facing down opposition?
Is this a project for Dublin City Council Beta? Is it too big for Beta? I don’t know, but there’s good reasons for it to be trialed rather than built in a process that takes years:
- Trialing it is quicker and action is needed urgently on improving safe cycling access in the city centre.
- It’s cheaper as it can largely be done with measures such as ‘Orcas’ etc (see images at the start of this article), bollards etc — the main cost of physical elements in this suggestion is probably traffic lights.
- It can be adjusted depending on the results, fairly quickly where needed.
You might also want to read trialing a route along the River Liffey and Part 1 of How to quickly build a Dublin City Centre Cycling Access Loop.
Those articles covered a two-way cycle path on the north quays from the Phoenix Park to the IFSC where the route would join the existing two-way cycle path on the southside, and the second article included a route from O’Connell Bridge to at least the Harcourt Luas Stop via Westmoreland Street, College Green, and South William Street.
In the last article we ended on Harcourt Street, but we purposely skipped the details of St Stephen’s Green as this article will look at that — namely putting in a two-way cycle path around the park-side of the green. The building-side cycle lanes would also be retained and improved.
A mix of reasons lends itself to have two-way around the green:
- It adds greatly to permeability (allows for turns etc not currently allowed).
- It aids in building a segregated network.
- It’s functional (while retaining existing building-side lanes)
- There’s generally space to be allocated for such without kerb changes.
- There’s no side streets.
There’s some downsides (getting back to the building side etc, but these are outweigh by the benefits above and by the fact this suggestion is also includes retaining and improving the building side cycle lanes.
We start at the south-west junction of St Stephen’s Green (which I’ll mainly refer to as just ‘the green’). Here, the orange space below is the suggested space to be transferred to cycling while red represents a turning lane closure:
Street View (link) shows the inside car here has diplomatic plates but this driving is common — both motorists are in the wrong place on a red light, but the the diplomatic car is also seems to be using the turning lane and cycle lane to skip the traffic. This is common enough here, far from confined to cars with diplomatic plates.
For clarity, this space marked in orange both should not be currently used for cars and is ripe to be given over to use by bicycles only with segregation keeping motorists off it:
In fact nearly all of St Stephen’s Green South (image directly below) is already down to one legal lane for motorist in the eastbound direction — so, little would be changing here except for adding protection for people cycling… we’ll get back to that, first we’ll look at St Stephen’s Green West in the next image…
The left turn from Cuffe Street to St Stephen’s Green West has a huge amount of space that’s not really needed:
Something like this might exclude long HGVs, but there’s good grounds for not letting such down this route in any case or some of the suggested curve here could be opened up so HGVs could make the turn from the outside lane:
Below is an outline of how this junction could have a Dutch-like protected junction with three two-way cycle paths meeting — St Stephen’s Green West, St Stephen’s Green South and Harcourt Street:
- Green lines: White painted lines with Orcas and Orcas with bollards inserts.
- While lines: White painted lines.
- Red boxes: Traffic lights (possable temporary building-site-like).
- Purple areas: Possible locations for harder segregation.
Continuing north along the western side of the green, the first image is the current view and the second image is what’s possible around this point — only kerb-to-kerb shown in the cross-section image of what’s possable… this first image, second image format is one we’ll continue in this article as noted:
A little further up it’s a bit narrower:
The route would then use the short two way cycle path between York Street and Grafton Street.
This would be on the narrow side for extra usage but usable over short distance — it can be widened at a later date.
This image is north of the two-way cycle path and the (unnamed?) laneway and then an option of what’s possable — the cross-section says parking lane but it would be a hotel bay / loading / 1-2 disabled parking to replace the ones needing to be removed slightly further north here.
There were plans for a plaza here at the junction with Grafton Street and removing cars, and it would be possable to trial such as part of this overall trial. But even on a phased roll out bases, there’s a lot packed into this already, so, it depends on how much the public or councillors etc want to push this.
If cars are not being removed, then some kerb changes would need to be made to allow motorists and a continuation o the cycle route — although the space needed is around the space which was originally suggested for a contra-flow lane suggested as part of the Luas Cross City works but did not make it into the final design:
Onto the northwestern section of the green — the fairly simple solution here is to make the park-side lane to be the cycle path… in the longer term changes should be made to transfer most of the massive buffer space along the tram line to the busy footpath on the left here:
At the end of this section the main route of the tram tracks then turn into Dawson Street — everything along is geared towards the tram tracks and providing for bus and private motorist movements. As we’re mainly dealing with what happens between kerbs, the only option at this location seems to be reduced the number of lane.
This might be one of the sticking points of the overall suggestion but is the only option given that the NTA and TII (also the council?) combined had little regard for providing segregated space for cycling in their placement of the Lady Grattan Drinking Fountain:
It’s quite wide after that:
This is outside the Shelburne Hotel:
This suggestion is based on the current size and not moving the centre line much as it lines up with the traffic island ahead. For buses, the suggested bus lane on the east side of the green (as suggested further below) should make up for this going down to one lane:
Here’s the current view of St Stephen’s Green East:
The cycle path here includes space for a tuning lane:
For now, we’ll go back to Harcourt Street and look at going the oppsite direction around the green. This is St Stephen’s Green South:
And what’s possable around here — including upgrading the building-side cycle lane. The building side cycle lane is needed to be retain to keep more direct routes, including, for example, from Leeson Street (N11 route) to the Camden Street area and beyond to Dublin 8 etc.
Leeson Street to the east and Kevin Street to the west go down to one lane in each direction, so, it’s not a huge leap or practical difference to also put this down to one lane.
Here’s what possable without removing the DublinBikes station:
Further on there’s also even more space along here for extra bicycle parking:
On the South-East corner of the green this kind of protected cycle route layout should be able to fit without kerb changes.
- Blue: Two-way cycle path.
- Green: Route from building side to two-way cycle path
- Green box: Protected waiting area
- Red: Routes from two-way cycle path to building sides
This layout would be for a trial — if the route was kept after the trial, the whole junction could then be reviewed.
And we are back onto St Stephen’s Green East and now the junction of Hume Street:
This shows the space allocation and the tree images show the different traffic light phases:
- Blue: Cycle paths.
- Light blue: Bus lanes
- Black dots: Pedestrian crossings
- Purple Private motor traffic.
To be continued….
September subscription drive update: IrishCycle.com has reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October), but this is unlikely and so the new target is the end of the year.
If you can help push IrishCycle.com above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!
Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.
IrishCycle.com is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.
There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for IrishCycle.com, it just needs enough people like you to believe!
Monthly subscriptions will give IrishCycle.com's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year IrishCycle.com had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.
I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.
The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!
But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via ko-fi.com/irishcycle/tiers