is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Cork University Hospital walking and cycling link: One of the strangest I’ve come across

COMMENT & ANALYSIS: When cycling down the Wilton Road on a visit to Cork, I spotted this walking and cycling link into Cork University Hospital. It looked good enough to stop and turn back for a look… Extra access for walking and cycling is great. But details are important and overall the details are horrible for walking cycling on this.

The only other entrance to the hospital campus from the Wilton Road side is to cross the road unaided where we have the red line and arrow marked below. The next option is to go around this roundabout, which is clearly not walking and cycling friendly. That should be fixed, but for now the walking and cycling link on the Wilton Road should be fixed.

And the entrance at the yellow box marking area is also marked as buses and emergency vehicles only:

Back to the walking and cycling link: Maybe I was unlucky, but the first thing I experienced was a long wait to cross the road….

For the most part, there’s nice clear separation of walking and cycling and the surfaces are good:

But the bollards on this path which slop down to the Wilton Road (pictured in the background here) gives a sense of a hostile environment — I don’t know if there any real risk of a cyclist getting injured if the fall on the top of these bollards, but especially facing down the slope, they feel more than uninviting.

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

For pedestrians they eat into the footpath space, which could be slightly larger even if the bollards were removed.

We’ll get to the barriers later, but first: The access to the rear of the two houses seems to be the reason for all the barriers along the footpath and the grass. But why? If there’s a removal bollard blocking all but occasional access, why line the path with bollards?

The barriers here further pen in people walking and cycling — the designers of this and the management of Cork University Hospital must (a) be really misguided or (b) hate walking and cycling and universal access.

Butting up barriers like that and telling cyclists to dismount is making a big presumption that all cyclists are fit and able. It would be hard to get many bicycles around that barrier and harder again for anybody with a disability.

As an aside: The sign to the left here shows a contra-flow cycle track sign. There’s no contra-flow cycle track here. It’s really unclear what the designers were trying to express here.

You could probably rule out use of this with any trike or hand cycle or cargo bicycle:

What went wrong here? Do they not care? Did somebody go out of their way to make it harder for people walking and cycling? is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty


  1. Looks like it was designed by an unsupervised work placement person who did not know how to read a list of traffic signs, did a architect or engineer sign off on this plan?

  2. The bollards are there because before the work was done the laneway was full of cars parked on both sides, over the grass. The central bollard nearest the Wilton road is a replacement because the initial one was lightweight and was knocked over more or less immediately. The design, bad though it is, has actually slightly improved pedestrian access because it doesn’t require any active enforcement of parking restrictions.


Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.