is reader-funded journalism. To keep it going and free-to-view, it takes people like you to act now and subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Dublin City Council removed “social distancing” traffic cones in city centre after safety complaints

— Question on how social distancing possible on narrow city centre footpaths unanswered.

— Politicians start call for space to be made to help social distancing.

Dublin City Council said last night that it removed traffic cones from a bus lane in central Dublin after complaints were made to the Gardai about them.

The traffic cones came with a hand-written sign saying it was a temporary footpath and told people to keep 2 metres distance.

A spokesperson for the council said: “Dublin City Council removed the cones in Stoneybatter as the Gardai had received complaints regarding the cones including from a cyclist who reported a near accident due to their presence on the road.”

The council did not respond to a question on how city centre residents are supposed to practice social distancing when the city council is leaving residents with narrow footpaths and no temporarily widened space as is happening in some offer cities in other countries.

Politicians have also started to call on space to be made available to help social distancing.

Cllr ‪Ray McAdam‬ (FG) said: “Delighted to have the @greenparty_ie on board as we seek to enhance pedestrian & cycling facilities within @DubCityCouncil area until #May5 at least. @FineGael group & I will be pursuing further with the CEO tomorrow.”

You're read this much of the article... So, if you value our journalism, please subscribe today for €5, €10, or €20 per month.

Cllr ‪Darcy Lonergan ‬(Green) said: “Hot off the press Greens write letter to @DubCityCouncil to call for reallocation of road space for walking & cyclying during COVID 19.”

In a letter addressed to Owen Keegan, the city council CEO, the Green Party is calling for cones to widen footpaths, temporary road pedestrianisations, and bollars to create quietways. is reader-funded journalism. That means it's funded by readers like you.

Subscription drive update: reached its target of 270 subscribers by the end of August -- thank you to all who have helped! Our new target is to have 300 subscribers by the end of 2022 -- originally this was hoped to be exceeded by the first year of running the site full time (end of October).

If you can help push above 300 subscribers, please subscribe today for €5 or more. If you have already done so -- thank you!

Please remember, every month there's a natural drop-off in subscriptions due to people getting new cards, cards stolen, Revolut not topped up etc.

*** is a reader-funded journalism publication. Effectively it's an online newspaper covering news and analyses of cycling and related issues, including cycle route designs, legal changes, and pollical and cultural issues.

There are examples, big and small, which show that the reader-funded or listener-funding model can work to support journalism -- from the Dublin Inquirer and The Guardian to many podcasts. To make it work for, it just needs enough people like you to believe!

Monthly subscriptions will give's journalism a dependable base of support. But please don't take free access for granted. Last year had an average of 15,800 readers per month and we know our readers include people who cycle and those who don't, politicians, officials and campaigners.

I know only a small percentage of readers will see the value of keeping this open enough to subscribe, that's the reality of the reader-funded model. But more support is needed to keep this show on the road.

The funding drive was started in November 2021 and, as of the start of June 2022, 250 readers have kindly become monthly subscribers -- thank you very much to all that have!

But currently, it's only around 1.6% of readers who subscribe. So, if you can, please join them and subscribe today via

Cian Ginty

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.